Table of Contents


Acknowledgements


Setting up, getting started

Refer to the guide Setting up and getting started.

Quick Set-up

  1. Ensure that you have Java 11 or above installed.
  2. Fork this repo, and clone the fork into your local computer.

Design

:bulb: Tip: The .puml files used to create diagrams in this document can be found in the diagrams folder. Refer to the PlantUML Tutorial at se-edu/guides to learn how to create and edit diagrams.

Architecture

The Architecture Diagram given above explains the high-level design of the App.

Given below is a quick overview of main components and how they interact with each other.

Main components of the architecture

Main has two classes called Main and MainApp. It is responsible for,

  • At app launch: Initializes the components in the correct sequence, and connects them up with each other.
  • At shut down: Shuts down the components and invokes cleanup methods where necessary.

Commons represents a collection of classes used by multiple other components.

The rest of the App consists of four components.

  • UI: The UI of the App.
  • Logic: The command executor.
  • Model: Holds the data of the App in memory.
  • Storage: Reads data from, and writes data to, the hard disk.

How the architecture components interact with each other

The Sequence Diagram below shows how the components interact with each other for the scenario where the user issues the command delete 1.

Each of the four main components (also shown in the diagram above),

  • defines its API in an interface with the same name as the Component.
  • implements its functionality using a concrete {Component Name}Manager class (which follows the corresponding API interface mentioned in the previous point.

For example, the Logic component defines its API in the Logic.java interface and implements its functionality using the LogicManager.java class which follows the Logic interface. Other components interact with a given component through its interface rather than the concrete class (reason: to prevent outside component’s being coupled to the implementation of a component), as illustrated in the (partial) class diagram below.

The sections below give more details of each component.

UI component

The API of this component is specified in Ui.java

Structure of the UI Component

The UI consists of a MainWindow that is made up of parts e.g.CommandBox, ResultDisplay, PersonListPanel, StatusBarFooter etc. All these, including the MainWindow, inherit from the abstract UiPart class which captures the commonalities between classes that represent parts of the visible GUI.

The UI component uses the JavaFx UI framework. The layout of these UI parts are defined in matching .fxml files that are in the src/main/resources/view folder. For example, the layout of the MainWindow is specified in MainWindow.fxml

The UI component,

  • executes user commands using the Logic component.
  • listens for changes to Model data so that the UI can be updated with the modified data.
  • keeps a reference to the Logic component, because the UI relies on the Logic to execute commands.
  • depends on some classes in the Model component, as it displays Person object residing in the Model.

Logic component

API : Logic.java

Here’s a (partial) class diagram of the Logic component:

How the Logic component works:

  1. When Logic is called upon to execute a command, it uses the AddressBookParser class to parse the user command.
  2. This results in a Command object (more precisely, an object of one of its subclasses e.g., AddCommand) which is executed by the LogicManager.
  3. The command can communicate with the Model when it is executed (e.g. to add a person).
  4. The result of the command execution is encapsulated as a CommandResult object which is returned back from Logic.

The Sequence Diagram below illustrates the interactions within the Logic component for the execute("delete 1") API call.

Interactions Inside the Logic Component for the `delete 1` Command

:information_source: Note: The lifeline for DeleteCommandParser should end at the destroy marker (X) but due to a limitation of PlantUML, the lifeline reaches the end of diagram.

Here are the other classes in Logic (omitted from the class diagram above) that are used for parsing a user command:

How the parsing works:

  • When called upon to parse a user command, the AddressBookParser class creates an XYZCommandParser (XYZ is a placeholder for the specific command name e.g., AddCommandParser) which uses the other classes shown above to parse the user command and create a XYZCommand object (e.g., AddCommand) which the AddressBookParser returns back as a Command object.
  • All XYZCommandParser classes (e.g., AddCommandParser, DeleteCommandParser, …) inherit from the Parser interface so that they can be treated similarly where possible e.g, during testing.

Model component

API : Model.java

The Model component,

  • stores the address book data i.e., all Person objects (which are contained in a UniquePersonList object).
  • stores the currently ‘selected’ Person objects (e.g., results of a search query) as a separate filtered list which is exposed to outsiders as an unmodifiable ObservableList<Person> that can be ‘observed’ e.g. the UI can be bound to this list so that the UI automatically updates when the data in the list change.
  • stores a UserPref object that represents the user’s preferences. This is exposed to the outside as a ReadOnlyUserPref objects.
  • does not depend on any of the other three components (as the Model represents data entities of the domain, they should make sense on their own without depending on other components)
:information_source: Note: An alternative (arguably, a more OOP) model is given below. It has a Tag list in the AddressBook, which Person references. This allows AddressBook to only require one Tag object per unique tag, instead of each Person needing their own Tag objects.

Storage component

API : Storage.java

The Storage component,

  • can save both address book data and user preference data in json format, and read them back into corresponding objects.
  • inherits from both AddressBookStorage and UserPrefStorage, which means it can be treated as either one (if only the functionality of only one is needed).
  • depends on some classes in the Model component (because the Storage component’s job is to save/retrieve objects that belong to the Model)

Common classes

Classes used by multiple components are in the seedu.addressbook.commons package.


Implementation

This section describes some noteworthy details on how certain features are implemented.

Undo feature

It extends AddressBook with an undo history, stored internally as a ReadOnlyAddressBook.

The operation is exposed in the Model interface as `Model#setAddressBook().

Given below is an example usage scenario and how the undo mechanism behaves at each step.

Step 1. The user launches the application for the first time. The originalAddressBook will be initialized with the initial address book state.

UndoRedoState0

Step 2. The user executes delete 5 command to delete the 5th person in the address book. The delete command calls LogicManager#updateOriginalAddressBook(), causing the modified state of the address book after the delete 5 command executes to be saved in the ReadOnlyAddressBook, and the exCommand is updated to delete 5.

UndoRedoState1

Step 3. The user decides that deleting the person was a mistake, and decides to undo that action by executing the undo command. The undo command will determine the exCommand is a delete command and call Model#setAddressBook(), which will reset the address book to the originalAddressBook.

UndoRedoState3

The following sequence diagram shows how the undo operation works:

UndoSequenceDiagram

:information_source: Note: The lifeline for UndoCommand should end at the destroy marker (X) but due to a limitation of PlantUML, the lifeline reaches the end of diagram.

Design considerations:

BUDDY App leverages on Java Stream and jSON data structures, to allow a single user create and edit contracts to their preference:

Aspect: How undo & redo executes:

  • Alternative 1 (current choice): Saves the entire address book.
    • Pros: Easy to implement.
    • Cons: May have performance issues in terms of memory usage.
  • Alternative 2: Individual command knows how to undo/redo by itself.
    • Pros: Will use less memory (e.g. for delete, just save the person being deleted).
    • Cons: We must ensure that the implementation of each individual command are correct.

Aspect: How filter executes:

  • Alternative 1 (current choice): filter down to one category tag
    • Pros: Easy to manage contracts in one category tag.
    • Cons: Not able to view other contact in the listing.
  • Alternative 2: filter multiple category tag
    • Pros: Combine two category tag into one result view
    • Cons: May have to navigate through all contacts within tag.

{more aspects and alternatives to be added}

Relate feature

Relate Command extends Command Abstract Class.

Relate Command serves 2 purposes with one command keyword relate:

  1. create relationship
  2. display people’s related contacts.

Which relies on RelateCommandParser to identify Index to and Optional<List<Index>> from, as well as RelateToPersonPredicate that filters matched Person from Model.

The sequence diagram of how RelateCommand related to various components: RelateSequenceDiagram

Design considerations:

The data structure to hold the mutual relationship chosen to be Set. Because in a pool of people related to a person should not have any duplicated one.

Originally, Set<Person> seem to be a natural choice which largely aligns with logic: Person has relation with another person. However, relation would be one of attributes of a person which later will be store in the json file. It could be difficult to store a list of JS Object under an Object. Unless we create another json file just for mapping relations, which could be more like a DataBase tables kind of storage.

I noticed that the id to identify a person in the original code base is actually name, which is why it does not allow person with same name. So for the ease of storage, I decidede to use Set<Name> to store the relation of person.

[Proposed] Data archiving

{Explain here how the data archiving feature will be implemented}


Documentation, logging, testing, configuration, dev-ops


Appendix: Requirements

Product scope

Target user profile

Karen, secondary school teacher with work commitments As a typical teacher managing 40 students in a class and in charge of other co-curricular activities, it is always a hassle to manage the contacts of students’ and parents’ information. In addition, manage contact information of external vendors that are involved in co-curricular activities and school’s event.

Value proposition

Project BUDDY is a Teacher’s Contact Management Application supported by CLI text input commands. Teachers can enter contact information for a swift search and retrieve desired contact information within a few keystrokes. The application provides an all-in-one display of the contacts related information and their details are presented in a beautiful scrolling view.

User stories

Priorities: High (must have) - * * *, Medium (nice to have) - * *, Low (unlikely to have) - *

no. As a I want to so that I can
1 forgetful user record down people’s number and address contact them later
2 organized user group contacts into different labels quickly filter out the category I want
3 productive user search contact by name or number find a contact easily
4 school teacher know which student and parents belong to the same family call the parents of the student
5 school teacher that uses multiple softwares copy a particular contact info paste it in other app to make use of the info
6 school teacher know which students belong to which class use the filtered list to take attendance
7 contacts user take notes for a particular contact record down happenings involving this contact
8 GUI user have different tags in different colors be visually pleased and easily distinguish them
9 contacts user quickly filter out all contacts without a tag assign at least one tag to them
10 contacts user batch select a list of contacts for editing assign tags to multiple contacts at once
11 careless user undo the previous command I will not lose my students’ contact details.
12 typo-prone user edit the contact correct the typo
13 visual person add photos to the contacts recall their identities
14 school teacher record students’ birthdays and filter contacts by birthday months prepare gifts in advance
15 school teacher record contacts’ email address contact them later
16 Diligent school teacher Which students needs help in particular subject Keep a close update on student’s subject progress
17 Health concerning teacher Get quick access to student’s emergency contact Call the contact immediately
18 Achievement motivating teacher highlight students with high flying result identity them to partake in school or national competitions
19 Co-curricular teacher group my co-curricular students Send updates on co-curricular activities
20 Concerning teacher Highlight students who often skipped classes or missed homework Contact student for a one to one session
21 Starter Add some sample data within the code get familiar with the app interface and features
22 Organized person sort by Alphabetical order quickly find out someone based on name
23 Visual Person Setting preference - colors or notification distinguish people more easily

{More to be added}

Use cases

(For all use cases below, the System is the Project BUDDY and the Actor is the user, unless specified otherwise)

Use case: Add a person

**add n/NAME p/PHONE_NUMBER b/BIRTHDAY e/EMAIL a/ADDRESS [t/TAG]

Use case: Edit a person **edit INDEX (must be a positive integer) [n/NAME] [b/BIRTHDAY] [p/PHONE] [e/EMAIL] [a/ADDRESS] [t/TAG] …​

Use case: Undo a command

MSS

  1. User accidentally deletes a wrong person from the contact list
  2. User requests to undo the delete command
  3. AddressBook recovered to the original list

    Use case ends.

Use case: Copy a contact

MSS

  1. User requests to list persons
  2. AddressBook shows a list of persons
  3. User requests to copy a specific person in the list
  4. The contact details are copied

    Use case ends.

Extensions

  • 2a. The list is empty.

    Use case ends.

  • 3a. The given index is invalid.

    • 3a1. AddressBook shows an error message.

      Use case resumes at step 2.

{More to be added}

Non-Functional Requirements

  • Should work on any mainstream OS as long as it has Java 11 or above installed.
  • Should be able to hold up to 1000 persons without a noticeable sluggishness in performance.
  • The command should be simple enough so that users are able to accomplish most of the tasks faster using typing than using the mouse.
  • Should be easy for new users to get used to usage fast.

Glossary

Mainstream OS: Windows, Linux, Unix, OS-X

  • Private contact detail: A contact detail that is not meant to be shared with others {More to be added}

Appendix: Instructions for manual testing

Given below are instructions to test the app manually.

:information_source: Note: These instructions only provide a starting point for testers to work on; testers are expected to do more exploratory testing.

Launch and shutdown

  1. Initial launch

    1. Download the jar file and copy into an empty folder

    2. Double-click the jar file Expected: Shows the GUI with a set of sample contacts. The window size may not be optimum.

  2. Saving window preferences

    1. Resize the window to an optimum size. Move the window to a different location. Close the window.

    2. Re-launch the app by double-clicking the jar file.
      Expected: The most recent window size and location is retained.

  3. { more test cases …​ }

Deleting a person

  1. Deleting a person while all persons are being shown

    1. Prerequisites: List all persons using the list command. Multiple persons in the list.

    2. Test case: delete 1
      Expected: First contact is deleted from the list. Details of the deleted contact shown in the status message. Timestamp in the status bar is updated.

    3. Test case: delete 0
      Expected: No person is deleted. Error details shown in the status message. Status bar remains the same.

    4. Other incorrect delete commands to try: delete, delete x, ... (where x is larger than the list size)
      Expected: Similar to previous.

  2. { more test cases …​ }

Relate

  1. Relate a group of persons to a person
    1. Prerequisites: List all persons using the list command. Multiple persons in the list.
    2. Test case: relate 2 <- 1 4 5
    3. Expect: contact 1 2 4 5 displayed (potentially other existing related contacts). Output message shows: contact2_Name has relation with: [“contact1_Name” “contact4_Name” “contact5_Name” “otherExistingNames”]
    4. Test case: relate 2 <- 1000
    5. Expect: Invalid contact index message
    6. Test case: relate 1000 <- 1
    7. Expect: Invalid contact index message
  2. Display all related persons of a person
    1. Test case: relate 2
    2. Expect: contact 1 2 4 5 displayed (potentially other existing related contacts). Output message shows: contact2_Name has relation with: [“contact1_Name” “contact4_Name” “contact5_Name” “otherExistingNames”]
    3. Test case: relate 1000
    4. Expect: Invalid contact index message

Saving data

  1. Dealing with missing/corrupted data files

    1. {explain how to simulate a missing/corrupted file, and the expected behavior}
  2. { more test cases …​ }